As you may recall, I have been trying to chase down a polling tool for my side bar for six months now. There are a number of interesting ones out there like Majikwidget (inspired/created by Guy Kawasaki) and WebPollCentral (Barry Moltz turned me onto that). However, TypePad finally saw the light and have integrated Vizu as a default option into their templates. So, the good news is that I can finally lob up polls, but the bad news is now I have to find topics that aren’t lame (sorry about the poor Jockey vs. Horse one but I just needed to get it up and running for testing). This is where you all come in…let me about polls that would be of interest???
Money 2.0: Measured vs Revolutionary
Given that fund raising is of particular interest to entrepreneurs, I have split out Money 2.0 from Bootcamp (kinda like a VC product extension…).
One of my readers in Germany asked:
"I have been enjoying reading your blog along with the blogs of a few other VCs and one question keeps nagging me. It appears as if the VC community looks primarily for investment opportunities in businesses where there is little to no competition and/or the core idea is quite revolutionary…[what about those that] focus on measured improvements."
The key driving force behind the early stage venture model is the need to hit a 10x return on capital if the idea works. Because about 60% of venture deals either break even or lose money, the winners have a significant burden to overcome. Around 30% of deals come in around 3-5x and it is the 10% (one out of ten) that drive the return and needs to be 10x.
As a result, early stage VC’s need to find opportunities which can swing for the fence. A company with a "measured improvement" unfortunately can not break out of the pack fast enough to garner market leadership and an exponential return. For new technologies to be adopted and to leap-frog incumbents, they need to be exponentially better (cost, efficiency, performance, etc). It is the only insurance policy. For service plays, the features and experience must be significantly better.
There is also an intangible factor that makes one deal backable and another not. I can’t quite explain it, but it usually revolves around the management teams aura and ability to communicate the vision. In the end, most venture plays rely on hope and aspiration to get launched. Just as there are some presenters who can wow crowds…Guy Kawasaki for example, there are some teams that are masters at sprinkling the pixie dust. I’ll save, for another day, what constitutes elements of a good pitch (big market, great team, super economics…simple right?).
As the firms get bigger, execution becomes more and more critical. Toyota, Apple, etc are examples of companies that, while not revolutionary per say, are masters at delivering great customer experiences. However, early on, it is hard to convey superior execution when all you have is a business plan. This is where "revolutionary" helps. This is why venture only makes sense for a small portion of new businesses.
Doing Good: Enlightened Entrepreneur
"That’s what Tiggers do best…"
— Tigger
Joe Born had a great follow-up email to the Venture Philanthropy post. He wrote:
"…what if we were sold/brought on new managment sometime down the road. What would my life be like if I was full time on a non-for-profit? Am I better off staying an entrepreneur and funding someone else’s project?"
VC’s often ask themselves the same question about entrepreneurship. Does it make sense to jump over to the light side and start up a business given all that we have seen and experienced? The answer depends upon the person and their DNA. Some VC’s make a great transition over. Andrew Anker jumped over to join the Six Apart team as have other VC’s over the years.
One of my favorite authors is Joseph Campbell who produced, with Bill Moyers, the Power of Myth series. He was one of the leading worldwide experts on "myths" and how they functioned to instruct and guide society and its people. He often used the phrase "follow your Bliss". By this, he meant to find that thing or things that give you purpose and energy when you get up in the morning. If making a difference in the lives of others gives you energy, find out in what role you are best employed. It could be as evangelist (if you are a good writer or speaker), or fundraising (if you are good at networking) or lobbying/policy (if you are strategically oriented and good at the political game) or operations in the field (if you are good managing people and getting things done). There are a lot of places for people with passion to play a role. Personally, I think it is more of an economic question than anything else. Do you want to forgo the potential economics of a successful company or the salary of being a CEO? Do you want to spend your time in the field with Chinese orphanages or in a tech start-up creating the next Google? Also, how well do you deal with the politics and cultural norms of the non-profit world? How well do you handle slow moving social systems?
I have spent a considerable amount of time in the inner city of Chicago. When my mother passed away over 10 years ago, I took several months off from work to walk around the inner city and think through how we wanted to direct our small, newly formed family foundation. (BTW, I can’t stress enough how important and rewarding it is to spend significant time in the field where services are delivered for your cause of choice. Too few people just write checks.) I concluded that my motor spins too quickly and I grow too impatient over impasses to work effectively in the field. I do not handle non-profit or neighborhood politics as well as others. However, I am a good evangelist and a good networker. I can provide support for the causes I believe in and help those who do work at the field level best. Everyone needs to self-assess. All of this obviously applies to entrepreneurial roles for everyone as well…
Figure out what your type of work your Tigger does best and follow your "bliss".
Venture 101: Plasma Inflection Point
"In times of rapid change, experience could be your worst enemy."
— J. Paul Getty
As we have written, VC’s are creatures of habit. Pattern recognition is our primary weapon of the trade. What makes the difference between a good VC and a great VC is how effective he/she is at making profitable decisions during periods of inflection and when old rules/experiences may hinder rather than help. In yet another example of how quickly things change when they go, look at the TV set world. The NYT has a great article "Picture Tubes Are Fading Into the Past". It just seems like a couple of years ago that flat panels were starting to reach "affluent" affordability and just in the last 18 months when more and more friends were bringing them into their houses. Now, major manufacturers are getting out of the CRT world altogether (Panasonic) or almost out (Sony). You want to be "where the puck is going, not where it is" in these cases.
You can see this starting to hit other areas as well like IPTV use/adoption. Never a dull moment in the venture world.
Blog of the Week: Startup Review
I came across an interesting new venture blog, Startup Review, written by Nisan Gabbay at Sierra Ventures. I like the format, which is more case study based than traditional postings. My fellow Feedburner board member/investor and uber-blogger, Brad Feld, gave a nice overview of Nisan’s new blog.
Blog of the Week: Startup Review
I came across an interesting new venture blog, Startup Review, written by Nisan Gabbay at Sierra Ventures. I like the format, which is more case study based than traditional postings. My fellow Feedburner board member/investor and uber-blogger, Brad Feld, gave a nice overview of Nisan’s new blog.
Buzz: AOL…Ouch
"Who’s the U-Boat Commander?
"
— Service Manager after Tom Cruise
puts his dads Porsche in Lake
Michigan (Risky Business)
How do you mess up a business this badly? AOL had 35 million subscribers at its peak. See the NYT’s quote below…it will lose 33% of its subscribers in the next year, which is already down 50% from its peak. It just goes to show how if you can see how the competition is going to eat your lunch, get to the lunch box early yourself and start eating…Technology moves too quickly and Darwin always strikes quickly.
NYT’s today: "The jobs eliminated by the current cutbacks will largely not be
replaced. An AOL spokesman said that the company had not ruled out
further layoffs but that none were in current plans. AOL has said it
expects to lose at least six million of its 17.7 million subscribers in
the next year and more than nine million in total over three years."
Bootcamp: Show Me the Money
"I am out here for you. You don’t know what it’s like to be ME out here
for YOU. It is an up-at-dawn, pride-swallowing siege that I will never
fully tell you about, ok?"
— Jerry Macguire
So, you all keep reading about how much money is floating around out there and how dysfunctional our business is becoming and yet, you are hitting wall after wall raising money. What the hell is going on? When is someone going to Show You the Money?
The Knife Edge: Here is the truth…raising venture capital is boolean. There is a knife’s edge (pretty dull) and you either fall into the a) next New, New Thing bucket or b) "Yes, But" bucket. In the New, New Thing bucket, you are the market leader (or #2 or #3) in a hot space that is going to be worth $10B according to Gartner. Your analogs are getting snapped up for $600m by News Corp or maybe you go IPO. VC’s are stumbling all over each other and you will likely raise too much money at a wacky valuation.
Yes But: Or, you are like vast majority of the real world, you are in the "Yes, But" bucket. This means, you start many of your presentations with "Yes, XYZ is in our space, BUT we have a better solution" or "Yes it is difficult to sell to municipalities, BUT we have a new, proprietary approach". In other words, you have a promising company in either a traditional or emerging space and while you are better than the incumbents/competitors, it is noisy and outside parties can’t readily discern your market leadership. You have steak but no sizzle. To make matters worse, you are probably selling into markets that have traditionally spooked investors (municipalities, insurance co’s, doctors, hospitals, manufacturing, etc).
Listen: So, what are investors going to do? They are going to look at your business. They are going to tell you that you have something promising and to stay in touch. And then, they will give you (if you are lucky) a handful of "issues" that need to be overcome. This could be showing that doctors in a region will adopt your service in mass or that insurance agents will use your tool (in numbers). In other words, they will give you milestones. Instead of ignoring these (because the VC doesn’t understand your model), take them seriously. Creating a plan that allows you to start addressing these in a capital efficient manner.
Know yourself. Be prepared for this brick wall if:
1) a lot of the efforts before you ended up in the graveyard or scaled slowly
2) there are few large companies doing what you are trying (scalability)
3) there are large incumbents with predatory practices in your market
4) your customers are not easy to sell to
5) other efforts have had to raise significant sums to get to the finish line
Show Me the Money: How do you raise capital in these situations? Couple of ways:
1) strategic capital: if there are customers who love what you do, some may be willing to prepay for services or even invest in the firm
2) angels: friends, families, businessmen from the industry, etc who believe in what you do. Lock down on lead (say $500k+) and the rest come around.
3) placement agent: if you are raising enough money, institutional sources are possible. They will likely introduce you to the same hedge funds and venture capitalists that you would have gotten to. Don’t expect any magic investors that are "unique". However, it saves you the time and effort of running the process. As my friend, Patrick Dealy say "spend your time making money vs. raising it".
4) sector focused funds: find VC’s that have been active in the space. Look at firms in your general space and see which funds put capital into them (avoid those funding your competitors).
Patterns: So, realize that for the vast majority, this bubble isn’t going to make your life any easier. It only applies to the funny money deals. It may mean that there are more angels coming out from under rocks (which is good). And, don’t let it frustrate you. Realize that the investor business is about pattern recognition. If you look too much like something that was previously painful, it is hard to change opinion without proof points. Good Luck.
Doing Good: GoodSearch
Nik Rokop just forwarded on a cool link…http://www.goodsearch.com/. The site allows charities to sign-up and as members use the Good Search engine (powered by Yahoo), the charity gets money. Kinda like uPromise meets affiliate marketing. Most charities seem to be raising small amounts here (hard to change consumers behavior like what they search with), but a pretty cool, well-intentioned idea. Anyone seeing any other types of creative Web 2.0 charity concepts?
Buzz: Return of the Corp Raiders
Wow. If you want to see a big difference between the buyout and VC world, check out this article in PE Week: Return of the Corporate Raider. It never ceases to amaze me how often the buyout shops will charge egregious fees for services that are standard, free value-add in the venture world.
Return of the Corporate Raiders
Burger King is supposed to represent the best of what private equity has to offer. Unfortunately, it also represents the worst…