Our Tipping Point

"The best way to understand the dramatic transformation…is to think
of them as epidemics. Ideas and products and messages and behaviors
spread just like viruses do."
                                     — Malcolm Gladwell

We, in the entrepreneurial world, live or die based upon Tipping Points. Al Gore is enjoying a rebirth talking about global warming tipping points. Malcolm Gladwell wrote a best seller called the Tipping Point. Venture capitalists talk about market inflection points. Chaos theory, complexity theory, self-forming networks…the list goes on.

The Midwest technology community, or any region’s for that matter, hinges on Tipping Points. Gladwell lays out a very interesting framework and San Diego provides a great example of how this works. Gladwell’s core elements include self-organizing networks, stickiness and context.  Ian Kaplan gives a great summary of this framework.

When you examine a social network (or technology corridor), you will see that there is a person or company at the center, which acts as a hub and is central in the spreading of information. It is central, well connected, knows the right people and knows what is going on in the network. Gladwell refers to this as the Law of the Few and describes how Paul Revere played this role and was central in raising the resistance in the American Revolution. In La Jolla, Hybritech was the core to that region’s biotech explosion. Before Hybritech, there was a lot of technology (Scripp’s Institute, Salk Institute, UCSD, etc) but few companies. Once Hybritech was sold to Eli Lilly, its managers spun out to form their own companies. The key, however, is that these managers were connected to each and had a common legacy. By the second generation of successful companies, again many connected to each other, the region hit a tipping point.

Gladwell’s more interesting element is not about how these networks take-off, but rather when they do.  He describes how "the Stickiness Factor" can have a significant impact by pushing the system out of equilibrium. The more contact that factor has, the more impact will result. It gives that influence significant leverage. In his example, he describes how disease normally remains in check. The number of people getting sick and those recovering basically offset each other. However, at certain periods, such as around holidays, people interact more with each other. Soon, more people are ill than are getting better and the system begins to spin towards epidemic.  In the technology world, this equates to the rate of new companies entering versus leaving the ecosystem. When these companies have common touch points or legacy, like with the flu, the network spreads more rapidly, heading towards “epidemic” (in a good way).

Lastly, he describes the Power of Context and how visual cues & other environmental factors can have such a dramatic impact on a change in behavior and in the development of these networks. He lays out how eliminating graffiti and cleaning up the streets have been shown to significantly reduce crime. People begin to view their environment differently. It’s like my kitchen. As soon as two or three dirty dishes remain in the sink, it signals to everyone that it’s okay to leave dishes there and soon the sink is overflowing with dishes. The Tipping Point has been hit. The same happens with celebrating success stories (or promoting repeated failures). The community begins to view itself increasingly one way or the other.

So what does this mean? It means that a technology community can take off quickly, triggered by simple elements. Social networks, information flow and connectivity are critical in governing the rate and suddenness of this development. Furthermore, how the community views itself and takes care of itself sets the stage or “context” as Gladwell calls it. While you can never predict exactly when a community will go “viral”, you can continue to stress and build upon the core elements that you know eventually lead to it happening: building social hubs, increasing interaction/stickiness and promoting a positive communal image & environment. We have a ways to go, but we are definitely heading in the right direction on all counts.

One last, unrelated point, Al Gore gives perhaps one of the most chilling examples (pardon the pun below) of a Tipping Point in his new movie “An Inconvenient Truth”. Global warming can continue for some time without a noticeable impact or difference. However, at some point, the ice shelves at the arctic, Antarctic or Greenland warm up enough and fall into the ocean.  This would supposedly raise the sea level worldwide 20ft.  This presents a small issue to a couple of parts of the world (like NYC…). Furthermore, while the ice reflects 90% of solar heat, the water absorbs a significant percentage of it (raising ocean temperatures). So, once we hit the Tipping Point, not only do you suffer (or benefit) the impact of the primary factor, but also from the secondary effects as well. Let’s hope Chicago becomes a tech haven before it becomes a seaside destination…

Doing Good: Entrepreneurship and Our Kids

  • "Innovation is the specific instrument of entrepreneurship… the act that endows resources with a new capacity to create wealth."
  •                                        — Peter Drucker
  • VC’s can be a cynical bunch. It takes a lot to get our attention. Well, this morning I was absolutely blown away by what I saw at the NFTE/Chase Teen Business Plan Competition. David Weinstein, CEC’s high energy entrepreneurial czar, helped to launch NFTE’s competition here in Chicago with funding from Motorola (thanks Jim O’Connor!). NFTE (National Foundation for Teaching Entrepreneurship) is a national organization that runs entrepreneurship programs at schools in low-income communities. Christine Poorman and Lauren McLaughlin oversee the Chicago chapter and ran the competition. Over the course of a school year, students take a course in entrepreneurship while also preparing a business plan for a potential business.

    I sat through 3 hours of presentations and watched in amazement as kids from some of the poorest communities in Chicago spoke about P/L statements, sales & marketing strategies (4 P’s for the MBA set), ROI, ROS, sources of start up capital and more. Over half the kids had actually launched small businesses and some were pulling in several thousand dollars a year. Over 60% of the presenters were girls, which I think is huge as this kind of involvement has a dramatic impact on life choices regarding teenage pregnancy, future studies and such. All of the kids were hoping to go onto 4-year colleges. All the plans also had a philanthropy component in them such as food to shelters, donations to causes and such.

    As I have written in the past, we are in big trouble if we don’t get kids interested in engineering and, more importantly, entrepreneurship. Small businesses drive the majority of job creation in our economy and are the key driver of innovation for our society. This is where the next Cisco or Google comes from. We are also seeing a massive digital divide form between economic classes. Just as I hope we start rolling out engaging science programs in our schools, I believe we need to bake as many entrepreneurial experiences as possible into our youth’s schooling.

    Other great programs involved in teaching this include Biz World and Junior Achievement.

    Resilience: Steve Jobs on the Power of Failure

    ""Nior dhun Dia doras riamhnar oscail Se ceann eile"
    (God never closes one door without opening another)

                                        — Irish Saying

    I have often written about the importance of Resilience in entrepreneurship. As they say, what doesn’t kill you, makes you stronger. This is easy to say in the abstract, but when you are going through massive set backs or failure, it is hard to feel that anything good will come of it. I certainly did not welcome the catastrophic yard sale of one of my most promising deals back in 2001. In one short year, this company went from being a potential $2B IPO (making 20x for us) to an $180m smoking hole in the ground. That said, I learned more about venture investing on that one disaster than I did on my previous 8 deals.

    One of the most moving speeches I have read/heard has been Steven Jobs Stanford University Commencement speech last year titled "You’ve got to find what you love". It is a must read for any up and coming entrepreneur. In it, he describes how fortunate he was to experience three normally traumatic set backs which all contributed to his stellar success. These were his dropping out of college, his very public firing from Apple and his bout with cancer. I won’t ruin the punchline…but take a look.

    Resilience: Steve Jobs on the Power of Failure

    ""Nior dhun Dia doras riamhnar oscail Se ceann eile"
    (God never closes one door without opening another)

                                        — Irish Saying

    I have often written about the importance of Resilience in entrepreneurship. As they say, what doesn’t kill you, makes you stronger. This is easy to say in the abstract, but when you are going through massive set backs or failure, it is hard to feel that anything good will come of it. I certainly did not welcome the catastrophic yard sale of one of my most promising deals back in 2001. In one short year, this company went from being a potential $2B IPO (making 20x for us) to an $180m smoking hole in the ground. That said, I learned more about venture investing on that one disaster than I did on my previous 8 deals.

    One of the most moving speeches I have read/heard has been Steven Jobs Stanford University Commencement speech last year titled "You’ve got to find what you love". It is a must read for any up and coming entrepreneur. In it, he describes how fortunate he was to experience three normally traumatic set backs which all contributed to his stellar success. These were his dropping out of college, his very public firing from Apple and his bout with cancer. I won’t ruin the punchline…but take a look.

    Buzz: Mary Meeker Unplugged

    "You say you want a revolution…We all want to change the world"
                                                    — Beatles

    Mary Meeker, Morgan Stanley’s Internet Diva from the Bubble, is back and firing on all cylinders. She gave a great presentation at the Stanford Graduate School of Business on "Global Technology/Internet Trends". I highly recommend it as it is full of a broad array of interesting statistics and analysis on the next technology wave. Some of the more interesting facts:
    1) the US prominence in consumer Internet use is waning quickly. North America represented 66% of Internet users in 1995 and only 23% in 2005. More and more activity, market focus and innovation will be taking place overseas.

    2) technology often follows a boom, bust, boom pattern. Google, Yahoo!, eBay, Yahoo! Japan and Amazon had, cumulatively, a $2B market cap at IPO, $178B value at peak in 3/00, a $32B value at trough in 10/02 and a $262B market cap as of 11/05. Buy when there is blood in the streets as they say…

    3) we are entering into, perhaps, the biggest of all technology cycles led by PC Internet (broadband) and the Mobile Internet. Previous cycles were Mainframe –> Minicomputer–>PC–>PC Internet (Narrow band). Now add –> PC Internet (Broadband)–> Mobile Internet.

    4) Driving these two cycles are a) broadband penetration (hitting 25-30% in 2004) and b) 3G penetration (expected to hit 25-30% in 2007). When people are able get high speed service to their phones and laptops wirelessly, we will truly see information become untethered. Seamless mobility…

    5) Two key risks threatening are:
        a) the lack of engineering students in the US (heard this before???)
        b) litigation: 2001, US industry spend more on tort litigation ($205B) than on R&D ($184B).

    6) The PC-Mobile Device is the next "client-server". Users make changes and control preferences on their PC which pushes to mobile (or provides for abbreviated versions of content).

    7) VoIP, IP Video, User Generated Content…the list goes on of "game changing" technologies enabled by broadband to home and mobile.

    8) US Ad spending on Internet continues to rise, slowly displacing each of the traditional channels.

    9) watch the kids for future of information and technology usage…

    Click on the link above and check out the full 58 page presentation. It is one of the most interesting and insightful presentations I have come across in a long time.

    The Siren Songs

    "History doesn’t repeat itself, but it sometimes does rhyme"
                                                                    — Mark Twain

    Here we go again. In Q1, we saw the highest median fund size raised on record according to Venture One (see the Venture Reporter excerpt below). It used to be said that an early stage venture group can’t deploy more than $300-400m and stay on investment style. The Siren Songs of large management fees are hard to resist.

    In Greek mythology, the Sirens lived on an island surrounded by rocks. Their sweet songs would draw unsuspecting boats near, shipwrecking them on the rocks. Odysseus escaped this fate by tying himself to a mast and plugging the ears of his men. Unfortunately, most venture firms do not have masts readily available. During the heady bubble, at one point, there were over 30 venture firms with funds at or over $1B. During the ensuing crash, everyone repented and dropped either their current fund or their next fund down to a more manageable level. Venture Reporter recently published Q1 fund raising stats:

    Though fewer VC firms, 17, closed funds in the first quarter of this year, they raised substantially more money, $4.26 billion compared to $2.5 billion by 22 firms for the same period a year ago. According to figures from Dow Jones & Co.’s industry tracker VentureOne, this quarter registered the highest median fund size on record, at $209 million compared to last year’s median fund size of $200.5 million.

    Five funds, ranging from $400 million to $1 billion, were responsible for the bulk of the capital. Likely to sustain the growth are large funds still in the market like VantagePoint Venture Partners’s fifth fund and New Enterprise Associates’ next fund likely to close on as much as $2.5 billion in what would be the largest U.S. venture fund ever raised. And even if we’ve seen a few contrarian VCs launching small funds like Alan Patricof’s Greycroft Partners LP, only 31.25% of new funds raised in the past quarter were managing less than $100 million.

    "Even in the heyday years of 2000 and 2001, there were at least 50% of the [venture capital] funds managing under $100 million," said Josh Grove, a research analyst at VentureOne

    How quickly we forget. A few MySpace type exits and funds are back raising $700-$1B funds again. The good news is that most of the carnage was caused by a lot of small funds, run by inexperienced VC’s, that jumped into any deal they could find while paying irrationally high prices. This time, at least, most of the money is going to established funds. They are creeping later stage, either providing growth or founder buyouts on more significant companies. You see a lot of this in the interactive marketing space. That said, as I said in my "Black Art" post, their challenge is going to be maintaining adequate exit multiples on deals that they pump $20-30M into.

    The Power of Exponentials

    Nothing is more powerful than the law of exponentials (Buffett refers often to the power of compounding interest). We all like to think in a linear fashion. If I work twice as hard, I will get twice the benefit. Products around me will continue to get incrementally better over time. The next version of software x will look like its predecessor but with added features and functionality. The biggest challenge with running technology firms is that technology advances exponentially. As a result, we get comfortable with a linear view of the world with a specific horizon, and our firm/product/service gets "curve jumped". Mainframes moved to mini-computers moved to PC’s moved to client/server moved to hosted solutions which is not moving to handheld/portable computing going to ???(bio computing). At each transition, the leader of the former (DEC, Microsoft, Sun, etc) wave is not the leader of the next. As Steve Jurvetson always points out, Disruption occurs at the Edges often out of the mainstream or at the interstices between disciplines.

    So, what are examples of exponential advances:
    — computing power & transistor density
    — (heat emanating from laptops…)
    — storage density
    — bandwidth
    — Internet users
    — genes mapped
    — proteins crystallized
    — imaging resolution
    — etc…

    This makes the life of the average citizen better but the life of a Tech CEO rather difficult. There have been a host of suggested frameworks written about to manage this…Only the Paranoid Survive (Grove), The Innovators Dilemma (Christiansen), Crossing the Chasm (Moore), etc. Great reads if you are interested in this stuff.

    What does this mean for a tech entrepreneur in a product business:
    1) Be Paranoid. Exponential change hits very quickly and once it hits, it advances rapidly passing you by. Never, ever get comfortable with the notion that you "have no competitors".
    2) Eat Your Own. This is a cliche, but yet firms do not do it. They get wed to their approach and their product. Use greenfield efforts or whatever it takes.
    3) Plan Exponentially. If your product road map does not show exponential improvement in both cost and features, you are vulnerable. You often have to force your team into this mode by started with the end goal (10x performance) and make them show how it is possible.
    4) Promote Out of the Box Thinking. Use off sights, consultants, brainstorming to create new ways at looking and addressing issues. How else can we solve problem A? Corporate inertia will perpetuate your current approach in a linear manner. If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
    5) Reality Check with Customers. Your way has to be the best way, correct? Firms spend a lot of time rationalizing why other approaches are getting traction and their "superior" solution is not. Be prepared to change or acquire as needed to stay ahead of the curve. Remember, the customer isn’t stupid (rationale #1).

    What can we expect in the future? Snapshots from US News & World Report’s "Download us_news_report.doc

    " has an array of very interesting statistics comparing 1900 to 2000. You should remember that  with exponentials, the progress made in next 20 years will match the progress from the past 100 years. In 1900, homes with electricity (8%), miles of paved road (10 miles), farm population (30 million, about 45% of total population), births taking place at home (95%), homes with bathtubs (14%), adults graduating from high school (6%). Of course, while life expectancy has risen from 46 to 74 years, cancer deaths have risen from 64 per 100,000 to 200 per 100,000.

    Buckle up for the future…

    My 15 Minutes of Fame

    "In the future everyone will be famous for fifteen minutes."
                                                                                            — Andy Warhol

    Thanks to Brad & Adam from ePrairie and Tim at StoryQuest for my 15 Minutes of Fame on their recent podcast. We talk about a variety of topics related to the general VC world and the Midwest entrepreneurial community. You can check out the ePrairie Podcast here.

    Is Your AIM True?

    In 1995, the London Stock Exchange launched the Alternative Investments Market (AIM) to offer smaller firms a less regulated market upon which to float their shares. While initially viewed by many as a novelty, it has begun to gain scale and respectability as more and more international firms are using it for going public. While many firms listing there do not have the requirements to list on LSE or Nasdaq, an increasing number do but are electing to avoid the costs and SOX burdens associated with a US IPO. Should this trend (and similar ones in Asia) continue, it will clearly begin to threaten the US’s role as the financial market of the world.

    Rob Schultz recently put up a great post on London Stock Exchange’s AIM market. He pointed out that pre-SOX, it cost his firm, DigitalWork, about $1M to go public. I believe that if the AIM can survive the next market down draft (emerging marketplaces are disproportionally hit), that it will increasingly become a major challenger to Nasdaq, especially for firms with market caps below $500m. Today, it is  not even close to having the volume or number of investors that Nasdaq does. However, as more and more smaller, emerging US firms elect to by-pass our increasingly expensive and cumbersome IPO market, it will see a significant increase in its liquidity. Future regulation and bureaucracy in the US will dictate how large the AIM will become.

    This movement is very similar to the threats the Chicago futures and options markets faced over the past decade. They moved aggressively to address concerns and weaknesses and are now stronger and more dominant than ever. How our markets and regulations adapt will determine the eventual outcome of this movement. As a VC, all other things being equal, I would much rather take a firm public in the US where we are more familiar with the legal system, institutional investors, etc. We will see…

    Glory Road: Peapod

    Technology revolutions always have a boom-bust-rebirth-boom pattern. The key to this is surviving the down draft when it hits. Mary Meeker, whose career has taken a similar path, laid this out in a very powerful way. She aggregated the market caps of Google+Yahoo!+eBay+Yahoo!Japan+Amazon over time.
        Pre-2000 IPO           = $2B
        3/2000 Peak           = $178B
        10/2002 bottom      = $32B
        11/2005 value         = $262B (approaching 10x the trough and 150x pre-IPO!)

    One of the most overlooked rebirths from this era is Peapod. Remember the $1B smoking hole in the VC road called Webvan? How about Kozmo or the array of other dead home delivery companies? Many started with low burn approaches but quickly ramped their burns in the hope of grabbing market share. My friends, Tom and Andrew Parkinson, founded Peapod in 1989, guided the company through the crash and now have, arguably, the most successful online home delivery grocery firm as part of Ahold. The May 1st Red Herring article "Life After Webvan"  is a great article detailing this great story. I highly recommend it to all aspiring entrepreneurs. As I have written over and over again, controlling your burn equates to controlling your destiny.